Owen Jones viewed design as structure. His argument was: “Construction should be decorated. Decoration should never be purposely constructed.” I think what Jones meant by this argument is that when making/ designing things that the craftsmen or designer should be true to his material and be true to the function of the object.
Jones argued that objects that are decorated should be done with respect to what the product is used for, that “conventional representations” are acceptable because they are appropriate to the function.
I agree with Jones’ argument because I think that the objects that were classed as ‘decorated construction’ in the nineteenth century were defiantly over decorated and had nothing to do with the function of the objects. An example of “constructed decorated” is Richard Redgrave’s ‘well-spring’ vase (1857) (as shown in the reading, page 50). I think that this is an appropriate example because the painted reeds on the vase represent that the vase is used to hold flowers and therefore the decoration is representing the vases true function. The ‘well-spring’ vase holds true principles when it comes to construction decoration. In comparison to this the flower lamp (shown on Wednesday 27th July lecture 3 on slide 17) is ‘decoration construction’, the ornament has no connection to the function. It could be questioned as to “why or how would a flower ever be seen with a flame coming out of it?” therefore this lamp holds false principles.



